IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT GOA
N.M. JAMDAR, PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ.
CANARA BANK - Appellant
Vs.
REMEDIANA DCOSTA - Respondent
Contempt Petition No. 37 of 2016; Writ Petition No. 1027 of 2016
Decided On : 25-10-2018
Contempt - Loan Default - Writ Petition - Undertaking - Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Article 215 of the Constitution of India
Fact of the Case:
The Respondents availed a loan from a Nationalized Bank, mortgaged their property as security, and sought to cancel the e-auction of the property. The Division Bench deferred the auction based on the Respondents' undertaking to pay the amount due, which they failed to do. The Court found the Respondents guilty of contempt for not honoring their commitments and sentenced them to imprisonment and fine.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the Respondents deliberately misled the Court, avoided service, and did not honor their commitments, leading to a finding of contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and Article 215 of the Constitution of India.
Issues: Non-compliance with loan repayment, breach of undertaking, avoidance of court proceedings, and contempt of court.
Ratio Decidendi: The Respondents' deliberate avoidance of court proceedings, failure to honor their commitments, and misleading the Court led to the finding of contempt under the relevant legal provisions.
Final Decision: The Respondents were held guilty of contempt and sentenced to eight days of simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1000 each.
N.M. Jamdar, J.
This Contempt Petition is filed with a prayer to punish the Respondents for non-compliance of the order dated 26 October 2016 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 1027 of 2016 and also for breach of undertaking dated 27 October 2016.
2. The Petitioner is a Nationalized Bank. The Respondents availed of a loan from the Petitioner-Bank of around Rs. 72.00 lakhs. The Respondents mortgaged their property as a security towards the loan. Since the loan was not repaid, the Petitioner-Bank proceeded to attach the property and put up the same for sale. The Petitioner-Bank issued a notice on 30 September 2016 of e-auction. The liability of the Respondents on that date, was Rs. 84,31,657. The Petitioner had valued the property at Rs. 1,01,50,000. The last date of submitting the tender documents was 28 October 2016 and the e-auction was scheduled on 31 October 2016.
3. The Respondents filed Writ Petition No.1027 of 2016 on 24 October 2016, seeking to cancel the e-auction and for an interim prayer to postpone the e-auction. This Petition came up on board on 26 October 2016 and the Division Bench, after hearing the Petitioner, passed the following order :
"Heard Shri Pranay A. Kamat, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners and Ms. Priyanka Kamat, learned Advocate appearing for the respondent.
2. Shri P.A. Kamat, learned Advocate for the petitioner essentially pleads that above petition be tried as a mercy petition to protect the petitioners from being dispossessed of his residential house which is likely to be subjected for a public auction on 31.10.2016 for recovery of the debts payable to the respondents. Shri P.A. Kamat, learned Advocate for the petitioner states that he does not dispute the correctness of the amount due to the respondent which is reflected in the auction notice to be sum of Rs. 84,31,657.62 with interest. The learned Counsel further points out that he would pay the total amount due on the subject loan to the respondent within 2 months from today in specific installments. The learned Counsel as such submits that the auction proceedings fixed on 31.10.2016 be deferred and the petitioners be permitted to pay the total amount alongwith costs of auction proceedings within a period of two months.
3. On the other hand, Ms. P. Kamat, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents points out that in case the petitioners desire that the auction be deferred the petitioners should deposit a minimum 25% of the amount on or before 31.10.2016 and the balance amount with accrued interest thereon within two months from today. The learned Counsel further points out that the petitioners are the defaulters, and as such, there is no reason to give any further extension of time to clear the dues of the respondent.
4. Shri P.A. Kamat, learned Counsel in reply to said contention submits that the petitioners are not in financial position to pay such 25% of the amount on or before 31.10.2016 but would pay the some substantial amount before the said date.
5. In peculiar facts and circumstance of the case and considering that the petitioners have offered to clear all the dues of the respondent alongwith costs of auction notice within two months from today, we find it fit to meet ends of justice to defer the action fixed on 31.10.2016 on the following terms :-
(i) The petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs. 10,00,000/- alongwith costs of auction proceedings on or before 31.10.2016.
(ii) The petitioners shall deposit further sum of Rs. 10,00,000/- on or before 10.11.2016.
(iii) Balance amount due on the subject loan shall be paid by the petitioner alongwith accrued interest within two months from today.
(iv) The petitioners shall file an undertaking to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court within two days from today that they shall pay the said amount referred to herein above.
(v) The petition stands disposed off accordingly."
3. On 15 November 2016, the Respondents filed Stamp Number (Application) No. 3572
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.