SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Bom) 1914

T.V.NALAWADE, VIBHA KANKANWADI
Yogesh s/o Sudhakar Chavanke – Appellant
Versus
Sitaram Damu Mate – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. V. D. Sapkal, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. S. S. Deshmukh, Advocate, Mr. S. D. Kulkarni, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

1. Since both the appeals are arising out of same Judgment and decree, they are proposed to be disposed of by this common Judgment. Both the appellants are the original defendants. They want to challenge the Judgment and decree passed in Special Civil Suit No. 27 of 2012 by Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kopargaon on 17-02-2016 whereby the suit for declaration and perpetual injunction came to be decreed against them. Parties are referred by their nomenclature before the trial Court.

2. Plaintiff has come with a case that, the property i.e. the agricultural land bearing Gut No. 165/1, admeasuring 1 Hectare 86 Ares plus barren land admeasuring 0.29 Are situated at village Nimgaon Korhale Tq. Rahata Dist. Ahmednagar is his ancestral land. Out of the said land, land admeasuring 1 Hectare 12 Ares plus Potkharaba 0 Hectare 07 Are, in all 1 Hectare 19 Ares is the suit property. Plaintiff has three adult married sons and wife in the family. They all are cultivating the said land. Plaintiff and defendant No.1 are distant relatives. It is stated that, taking d




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top