Jamshed Noshir Sukhadwalla vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2018 Supreme(Bom) 1922

NARESH H.PATIL, R.G.KETKAR
Jamshed Noshir Sukhadwalla – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Navroz Seervai, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Shyam Mehta, Sr. Advocate a/w Mr. Zerick Dastur, Ms. Smriti Singh, Mr. Kunal Kothary, Ms. Tanvi Gaitonde i/by Zerick Dastur and ANB Legal.
For the Respondents:Mr. Anil C. Singh, ASG a/w Mr. Sandesh Patil, Mr. Aditya Thakkar, Ms. Indrayani Deshmukh, H.V. Tamanna and Ms. Geetika Gandhi. Mr. Ashutosh Kumbhakoni, AG a/w Mr. L.T. Satelkar, A.G.P. Ms. Kavita N. Solunke. Mr. Shrihari Aney, Sr. Adv., Mr. A.V. Anturkar, Senior, Advocate a/w Mr. Prathamesh Bhargude, Mr. Ranjit Shinde, Mr. Yatin Malvankar, Mr. Ajinkya Udane, Mr. Roopadaksha Basu, Ms. Nehal Mahuli i/by The Law Point. Mr. F.E. Devitre, Senior Advocate, Mr. D.D. Madan, Senior, Advocate a/w Mr. Hormaz Daruwalla, Mr. Somasekhar, Mr. H.N. Vakil, Ms. Suzan Vakil and Miss. M. Mehta i/by Mulla and Mulla and Craige Blunt and Caroe

JUDGMENT :

NARESH H. PATIL, J.

1. The petitioners pray for following substantive reliefs:

“(a) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction restraining the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 from commencing and/or carrying out-construction of any tunnel or under-ground-construction which passes under the premises of-the H.B. Wadia Atash Behram or Zarthosti-Anjuman Atash Behram and at such a distance-from the said Atash Behrams as may cause-damage to the structure of the Atash Behramsand/or cause the water in the wells situated in the Atash Behrams to be affected in any manner;

(a-1) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent Nos.1 to 4to construct the proposed Kalbadevi Station at such a distance from the H.B. Wadia AtashBehram that it does not cause any damage to the structure of the H.B. Wadia Atash Behramand/or cause the water in the wells situated in the H.B. Wadia

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2018 Supreme(Bom) 1922

NARESH H.PATIL, R.G.KETKARJamshed Noshir Sukhadwalla – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

Cases Referred (47)

NARESH H.PATIL, R.G.KETKAR
Jamshed Noshir Sukhadwalla – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent