S.S. Shinde, J.

1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, and heard finally with the consent of the parties.

2. This Petition is filed with the following substantive prayers :

(B) By issuing appropriate writ, order or directions in the like nature, the impugned order dated 09.05.2018 issued by the Respondent no.2 may kindly be quashed and set-aside.

(C) By issuing appropriate writ, order or directions in the like nature, the Respondent no.2 be directed to grant approval to the proposal dated 24.04.2018 (EXHIBIT ‘G’) forthwith.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that, he has passed H.Sc., D.Ed. and is eligible to be appointed on the post of Assistant Teacher for teaching the students of 1st standard to 7th standard. Respondent no.3 is the school, having 1st to 10th standards, wherein the petitioner was appointed, vide order dated 24th December, 2012, initially on probation for a period of two years. As per the staffing pattern of the said school, there are 19 sanctioned posts in the said school, such as, one post of Headmaster, 17 posts of Assistant Teachers and on