SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 111

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
B.R. GAVAI, N.J. JAMADAR, JJ.
Biju K. Balan & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, through Ministry of Urban Development, Mantralaya & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 2152 of 2014 With Writ Petition No. 2800 of 2015 With Writ Petition No. 1382 of 2016 With Writ Petition No. 2060 of 2016
Decided On : 23-01-2019

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Ms. Sneha Phene along with Mr. Gireesh U.G. Menon, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Ms. P.H. Kantharia, Government Pleader along with Ms. Deepali Patankar, Hon. Asst. to Government Pleader, Mr. Sagar Patil, Advocate, Mr. Sanjay Sinha, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Nair along with Mr. Hafeezur Rahman, Advocate, Ms. G.R. Shastri, Addl. Government Pleader, Mr. L.T. Satelkar, Asst. Government Pleader, Dr. Milind Sathe, Senior Counsel along with Mr. Firdosh Pooniwalla, Mr. Ankit Lohia, Ms. Melanie Dsouza i/by M/s. A.S. Dayal & Associates, Advocate.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 21 and 226 - Installation of Equipments for Telecommunication - Garden is only green lung for residents - Studio Compound Residents Welfare Association consists of seven Co-operative Housing Societies within Compound and one society situated outside the said compound - While permitting development Studio Compound condition was imposed certain area be surrendered to respondent No.1-Corporation for the purpose of a recreational ground for children below age area admeasuring 1841 came to be surrendered in favour of respondent No.1-Corporation - Childrens recreational park came to be built. garden is only green lung for the residents of the Compound – Held, Having examined the matters on anvil of special burden of proof in environmental cases, as expounded by the Supreme Court, in case of A. P. Pollution Control Board – Court find scientific material, as of today, does not indicate any identifiable risk of serious harm on account of non-ionized radiation emanating from TCS/BS and Equipments for Telecommunication Network – Court are not inclined to exercise our jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India on the basis of apprehensions which are not rooted in facts and supported by reliable scientific material - Court are mindful of fact foundational basis of aforesaid judicial pronouncements and view which we are persuaded to take is prevalent body of scientific opinion - Since risk potential is enormous – Court need to be in a state of perpetual precaution strict enforcement of the prevailing standards and continuous research to obviate possible risk are absolutely necessary - petitions is dismissed

JUDGMENT :

N.J. JAMADAR, J.

1. In these Writ Petitions, the challenge is to the permissions granted by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to the telecommunication companies for erection of the Telecommunication Cell Site (“TCS”) / Base Station (BS) and installation of Equipments for Telecommunication Network.

2. In Writ Petition Nos. 2060 of 2016, 2800 of 2015 and 1382 of 2016, the petitioners question the permission granted to respondent No.3-Reliance Jio-Infocom to erect the Telecommunication Cell Site (“TCS”) / Base Station (BS) and installation of Equipments for Telecommunication Network in a Recreational Ground. Whereas, in Writ Petition No. 2152 of 2014, the petitioner assails the grant of permission for setting up of Telecommunication Cell Site(s)/Base Station(s) and installation of equipments for Telecommunication Network (for short, referred as “TCS/BS”) on terrace of the building of Vikrant Co-operative Housing Society Limited-respondent No.3 therein, granted by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, respondent No.2 to ATC Telecom Tower Corporation Private Limited, Respondent No.4.

3. As Writ Petition Nos.2800 of 2015, 2060 of 2016 and 1382 of 2016 arise out of an identical factual backdrop and Writ Petition No. 2152 of 2014 is also based on the premise of perceived adverse effect of electro-magnetic radiation, generated by TCS/BS and installation of Equipments for Telecommunication Network, on health and well-being of humans and other living species, we deem it appropriate to dispose of all these petitions by a common judgment and order.

4. Writ Petition No. 2800 of 2015 was reckoned by the parties as the lead petition. Thus, the facts in Writ Petition No. 2800 of 2015 are required to be noted in greater detail in this batch of the Writ Petitions, i.e., Writ Petition Nos. 2800 of 2015, 2060 of 2016 and 1382 of 2016.

BACKGROUND FACTS :

5. Rajkamal Studio Compound Residents Welfare Association consists of seven Co-operative Housing Societies within Rajkamal Studio Compound and one society situated outside the said compound. While permitting the development of the Rajkamal Studio Compound (hereinafter referred to as “Compound”), a condition was imposed that certain area be surrendered to the respondent No.1-Corporation for the purpose of a recreational ground for children below the age of 12. Accordingly, an area admeasuring 1841 sq.mtrs., designated as C.S. 121, came to be surrendered in favour of respondent No.1-Corporation. A childrens' recreational park, namely, “V. Shantaram Balodyan” came to be built. This garden is the only green lung for the residents of the Compound.

6. In May-2015, the representatives of respondent No.3 came to the said garden for the purpose of erecting TCS/BS. Upon enquiry, it transpired that respondent No.1-Corporation had granted permission to respondent No.3 on 20th February 2015 for erecting the TCS/BS. Firstly, the petitioners assert that, the said permission dated 20th February 2015 has been granted by respondent No.1-Corporation in violation of the Notification issued by respondent No.2-State of Maharashtra, on 4th March 2014, whereby “Regulations for setting up of Telecommunication Cell Site(s) /Base Station (s) and installation of equipments for Telecommunication Network in the State of Maharashtra” were published. The petitioners assert that the said permission dated 20th February 2015 is legally unsustainable as it has been accorded without obtaining the 'No Objection' of the concerned registered co-operative housing societies or consent of the 70% of the total number of legal occupants/plot holders of the said layout, in terms of the aforesaid Notification dated 4th March 2014. Secondly, the permission was also assailed on the ground that it permits installation of TCS/BS and Equipment for Telecommunication Network in the ecologically sensitive/important area. Third









































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top