SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 161

SADHANA S.JADHAV
Nishikant Bhaskarrao Kulkarni – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ritesh Thobde, Shree Ram Kulkarni, Devidas Jadhav, Y.M. Nakhwa.

JUDGMENT :

Sadhana S. Jadhav, J.

1. The Appellants herein are convicted vide judgment and order dated 27.12.2005 in Sessions Case No. 16 of 1999 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Malegaon. The Appellant (in Criminal Appeal No. 143 of 2006) Original Accused No. 1 is convicted for the offence punishable under Section 13 (1) (d) r/w. 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentenced to suffer R.I. for 1 year and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default, to suffer S.I. for 2 months. The Appellant (in Criminal Appeal 111 of 2006) Original Accused No. 2 is convicted for the offence punishable under section 7 r/w. 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to suffer R.I. for six months and to pay fine of Rs. 500/- in default, to suffer S.I. for one month. Hence, this appeal.

2. Such of the facts necessary for decision of the appeal are as under.

3. The Appellant-Dr. Nishikant Kulkarni in Criminal Appeal No. 143 of 2006 was officiating as a Medical Officer at Manmad Municipal Hospital in the year 1987. Appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 111 of 2006 was serving as a peon in the said hospital. On 9th September, 1987, Manohar Mulchandani approached the o





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top