SUNIL B SHUKRE, S.M.MODAK
ADITYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of Shri S.G. Jagtap, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri S.Y. Deopujari, learned Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Shri A.S. Jaiswal, learned Senior Advocate i/b Shri G.E. Moharir, learned counsel for respondent No. 5.
2. Considering the facts admitted, as regards the issue involved in this petition, we do not find it necessary to reproduce entire facts of the case. Suffice it to state a few of them which would have bearing on the issue raised herein. A tender notice was issued for awarding the contract of work of Cement Concrete road between Zingabai Takli Godhani (Railway) Bokara and Koradi Road on a patch of National Highway No. 69, Tahsil & District - Nagpur. In response to this notice, bids were received by respondent Nos. 2 to 4. It was one of the essential conditions of the bidding document (see condition No. 7.2) that offer in envelope No. 2 must be accompanied by a Demand Draft (DD) or a Bank guarantee of appropriate amount of performance security. As per the condition contained in 2.8.4 of this document, it was clear that if the offer contained in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.