SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 263

MANISH PITALE
PARVATABAI @ BEBY W – Appellant
Versus
SUREKHA @ REKHA W – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Sahil S Dewani, Adv., Nitin D Sonare, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

MANISH PITALE, J.

1. Heard.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The writ petition is heard finally with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.

3. By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged order dated 18/06/2018 passed by the Court of 11th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Nagpur (Trial Court) in M.J.C. No.192 of 2017, whereby application filed by the petitioners below Exhibit18 for dismissal of the proceedings initiated by the respondent herein, was rejected.

4. The facts leading to filing of the present writ petition are that the petitioners had filed an application for grant of legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 (hereinafter referred to "Regulation"). The said application was granted by the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nagpur by judgment and order dated 13/06/2017. An application was filed by the respondent on 02/03/2017 under the very same Regulation for grant of legal heirship certificate wherein the petitioners were made parties as non-applicants. The respondent specifically described certain proper































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top