SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 429

G.S.PATEL
SULOCHANA DINANATH TARKAR – Appellant
Versus
ANIL DINANATH TARKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.G. Saraf, Jessie Misquitta, Farkhan Khan, R. Sathyanarayan.

JUDGMENT :

G.S. Patel, J.

A. BACKGROUND; PARTIES:

1. Dinanath Harishchandra Tarkar ("Dinanath"; "the testator"; "the deceased") died on 20th January 2001. He left a Will dated 9th March 1981. (Exhibit B, pp. 9-11)

The original Plaintiff, Sulochana Dinanath Tarkar ("Sulochana"), sought Letters of Administration with this will annexed. She was Dinanath's second wife and the sole beneficiary under his Will.

2. Dinanath's first wife was also named Sulochana, the name she was given after marriage. Her maiden name was Sumati Poyrekar. She died on 11th November 1954. She and Dinanath had two children, Anil Dinanath Tarkar ("Anil") and Savita Chandrakant Naringrekar ("Savita"; Snehalata before marriage). Anil was an infant a few days old and Savita a child of three when their mother passed.

3. Dinanath then married the original Plaintiff, his second wife, also named Sulochana, in May 1955. (References in this judgment to 'Sulochana' are, therefore, to Dinanath's second wife.) The original Plaintiff's maiden name was Godavari Ganpath Birje. She was given the name Sulochana on marriage. They
























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top