SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Bom) 2032

M.G.GIRATKAR
Raju Deorao Bhurse – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.P. Gangane, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

M.G. Giratkar, J.

None appears on behalf of the applicant/accused. Non bailable warrant was issued by this Court on 12.09.2018. It was not served. This Court, on 30.11.2018, issued bailable warrant of Rs.5,000/-. It is duly served on the applicant/accused. Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli reported about the service of bailable warrant to the applicant/accused. Even though, the applicant remains absent. His Counsel also remains absent. Revision is of the year 2007. Hence, with the assistance of Shri V.P. Gangane, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the matter is being decided finally.

2. Learned APP has pointed out the judgment of Assistant Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli which was confirmed by the Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli on 07th March, 2007 in Criminal Appeal No. 02 of 2006. Learned APP has submitted that there was no dispute about the sexual intercourse by the applicant/accused. The only dispute in respect of age of the prosecutrix. As per the defence of accused, she was more than 16 years at the time of incident. But, it is brought on record by birth certificate (Exh. 27) that she was born on 30th October, 1983 and incident took place on 20.01.1999 which shows that she was aged





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top