SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 487

VIBHA KANKANWADI
Manikrao – Appellant
Versus
Gangabai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Rajendra Deshmukh, Adv., Amol Joshi, Adv., R.N. Dhorde, Adv., H.P. Kshirsagar, Adv., C.T. Jadhav, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

1. Present appeal has been filed by the original defendants No.1 and 2 challenging the concurrent findings of both the Courts below. Present respondent No.1 had filed Regular Civil Suit No.250 of 1997 before Civil Judge, Junior Division, Gangapur for partition and separate possession. The pedigree given in the plaint para No.02 is reproduced here for the sake of convenience;

Yeshwanta

 

Renuibai Yeshwanta (dead)

 

Manikaro (Deft.No.1)

Ramrao (dead)

Dada (Deft. No.2)

Sitabai Vithal (dead)

 

Gangubai Ramrao (Plaintiff)

Raosaheb (Deft. No. 3)

Tarachand (Deft. No. 4)

 

2. Plaintiff is the daughter-in-law of late Renubai who expired on 22-01-1994. Defendants No.1 and 2 are Renubai’s sons and defendants No.3 and 4 are the sons of Sitabai who was the daughter of Renubai. Defendants No. 5 and 6 are the sons of plaintiff. It is contended that, the suit lan






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top