SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 500

T.V.NALAWADE, MANGESH S.PATIL
Balasaheb – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Thombre S.S., Adv., Borade P.G., Adv., C.V. Thombre, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Mangesh S. Patil, J.

Heard.

2. Rule. The rule is made returnable forthwith. The learned APP waives service for respondent State. With the consent of both the sides the matter is heard finally at the stage of admission.

3. In this proceeding under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicants who are the accused in Crime No. 279/2018 registered with Police Station Dindrud District Beed for the offence punishable under section 39 of the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 ( hereinafter, "the Act"), are seeking its quashment.

4. Facts leading to the filing of this application may be summarized as under:

One Dattatraya Ramkisan More and his wife Vithabai More resident of Kari Tq. Dharur District Beed lodged a complaint with District Registrar Co-Operative Societies Beed inter alia alleging that the applicants are indulging in illegal money lending and were threatening them. One Shri. S.D. Neharkar was appointed to carry out the enquiry. He submitted report dated 24.05.2017 holding that there was no money lending. Shri. Dattatraya Ramkisan More then challenged that order before the District Magistrate who directed the matter to be enquired afresh by con














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top