SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 551

S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, M.S.KARNIK
SIDDHI VINAYAK – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Prakash Shah, Adv., Jas Sanghvi, Adv., Pds Legal, Adv., Pradeep S. Jetly, Adv., Devesh Tripathi, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.

Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith.

2. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are claiming the following two reliefs:-

"(a) this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records and proceedings pertaining to the impugned Notifications and after examining the legality and validity thereof be pleased to quash and setting aside Notification No.32/2015-2020 dated 30.08.2018 and Notification No.37/2015-2020 dated 28.09.2018 both issued by Respondent No.2;

(b) this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ordering and directing the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 to forthwith permit clearance whole Green Peas in terms of Sales Contract No.CS0001083 dated 19.04.2018 including consignment of 188.60 MTS of Whole Green Peas lying in the bond







































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top