K.K.SONAWANE
GOVIND – Appellant
Versus
SAVITA – Respondent
K.K. Sonawane, J.
Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The matter is taken up for final hearing on merit with consent of both the sides.
2. The applicants, invoking remedy under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), preferred the present application seeking relief as below :-
"(B) The order dated 23-10-2018 passed by Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Ambejogai in Criminal Revision No. 42/2018 and order dated 03.05.2018 passed by JMFC, Parli Vaijinath in R.C.C. No. 219/2016 issuing a process u/sec. 494 and 109 of I.P.C. May kindly be quash and set aside."
3. The factual aspects giving rise to the present application sans unnecessary details are that, the applicants are arraigned for an offence punishable under Sections 494 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in private complaint filed by respondent No.1 Savita w/o. Govind bearing RCC No. 219 of 2016, on the accusation that applicant No.1 Govind s/o. Tukaram Karad performed second marriage with one Kalpana @ Bhura w/o. Govind Karad, during the life time of his legally wedded wife Sou. Savita w/o. Govind Karad i.e. respondent No.1 herein.
4. It has been alleged on behalf of respondent No.1 Savita
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.