SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 554

K.K.SONAWANE
GOVIND – Appellant
Versus
SAVITA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.K. Munde, Adv., Sandeep D. Munde, Adv., K.N. Lokhande, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

K.K. Sonawane, J.

Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The matter is taken up for final hearing on merit with consent of both the sides.

2. The applicants, invoking remedy under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), preferred the present application seeking relief as below :-

"(B) The order dated 23-10-2018 passed by Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Ambejogai in Criminal Revision No. 42/2018 and order dated 03.05.2018 passed by JMFC, Parli Vaijinath in R.C.C. No. 219/2016 issuing a process u/sec. 494 and 109 of I.P.C. May kindly be quash and set aside."

3. The factual aspects giving rise to the present application sans unnecessary details are that, the applicants are arraigned for an offence punishable under Sections 494 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in private complaint filed by respondent No.1 Savita w/o. Govind bearing RCC No. 219 of 2016, on the accusation that applicant No.1 Govind s/o. Tukaram Karad performed second marriage with one Kalpana @ Bhura w/o. Govind Karad, during the life time of his legally wedded wife Sou. Savita w/o. Govind Karad i.e. respondent No.1 herein.

4. It has been alleged on behalf of respondent No.1 Savita







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top