IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
B.P. Dharmadhikari, Prakash D. Naik, JJ.
Iliyas @ Illu Nawaz Khan – Appellant
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and Ors – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 967 of 2010, 867 of 2011, 957 of 2010
Decided On : 12-04-2019
Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 302, 143,144,147,148, S.149,120B,37(1)(a),135 – Challenge – Appeal Against Conviction – Murder Case - Partners in a medical shop - Prior to date of incident about 4 days before deceased informed about dispute between himself and on unloading of vehicles carrying scrap - Visited medical shop at 11.00 p.m. and at about 11.20 p.m. he was on his way to his residence - When he was passing by Road No.13 and turning towards lane, he was assaulted by accused No.1-Khurshid @, accused No.2-, accused No.3-Alpraj @, accused No.4-Sunil @ Papa and accused No.5- - and then standing on road near house of saw them assaulting with weapons like bamboo dragger knife and chopper - After attack they ran away with weapons - (PW-4 and PW-5) both went to the spot and found with multiple injuries in pool of blood - Was then shifted to hospital at where he was declared dead - hospital informed Nagar Police Station at 11.40 a.m. and PSI on duty went to hospital prepared inquest panchanama. He recorded statement of. (PW-2) which was subsequently treated as FIR and Crime No. was registered against accused. During investigation criminal conspiracy to commit murder of came to surface - After arrest of respective accused blood stained clothes and consequent to discovery under section 27 of the Evidence Act blood stained weapons were seized – Held, Convenient to look into recoveries under S. 27 of the Evidence Act from the respective accused. On a chopper with blood like stains is seized at instance of accused 1. It is claimed that he unearthed it from a heap of soil where it was buried near - PW-17 examined by police to prove the statement of disclosure & later recovery has not supported the prosecution. A bamboo each is recovered at instance of accused 2 on 14.10.2008 & accused 5 on 13.1.2008. We need not go into evidence of PW-16 & PW-14 in this connection since the office of CFLS has returned both these bamboos as one article - Which bamboo piece is recognized by these witnesses is therefore not clear - Moreover, the medical evidence also does not show any injury by bamboo and CA report on bamboo is inconclusive. Prosecution could not show any human blood on any Bamboo. A knife with bloodstains is discovered by accused 3 from the roof of his house as per panchanama Ex. - A dagger with blood like stains is discovered by accused 4 Sunil on 13.10.2008 from roof of his house vide Ex. 96 & 97 –Thus weapons are recovered almost 6 to 7 after attack & 4 to 5 days of arrests. Except for chopper other recoveries are from roofs or from within house - So after alleged offence these accused persons went to their homes & concealed murder weapon there but then did not change into other clothes & were apprehended in same clothes ie bloodstained clothes roughly after 48 hours – When there were large number of clothes all needed to be seized by giving it a unique identification number & by writing it on a label attached to each cloth with seal & signatures of respective witnesses so that in Court when cloth is produced, one will be able to comprehend name of witness in whose presence it was sealed & seized as also name of person from whom it was seized - Assistance of a witness may not be required to identify particular clothing item & to connect it with its owner - So in a given case, school uniforms of all children if seized must be distinctively marked to avoid further confusion – Ordered Accordingly
B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.
Total 9 persons were accused of offences under sections 302, 143,144,147,148, S.149 & S.120B IPC & 37(1)(a),135 of Bombay Police Act for killing one Hanif @ Allabakshish Allauddin Shaikh on 07/10/2008. Accused Nos. 1 to 8 were tried together & and vide impugned judgment & order dated 18.10.2010 passed by the Extra Joint Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, C.R. No. 2, Sewree, Mumbai has in Sessions Trial 51 of 2010 convicted accused Nos.1 to 5 while accused Nos.6 to 8 have been acquitted. Acquittal of accused Nos.6 to 8 has not been challenged by the State or by any aggrieved before this Court. Similarly, accused No. 9 Zakir Hussain Abdul Mannan Shaikh who is stated to be the brain & principal behind the conspiracy was tried separately in Sessions Case 461 of 2013 & has been acquitted by the Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai on 12/04/2016. This acquittal has also become final.
2. Appellants Nos.1, 2 & 4 are before this Court in Appeal 867/2010 while Appeal 957/2011 is by accused 3 & Appeal 967 of 2011 is preferred by accused no. 5.
3. It will be beneficial to note the effort of prosecution before the Trial Court as under:
One Doctor by name Mohd. Fahim Shaikh and deceased Allabakhsh were partners in a medical shop. Prior to the date of incident dated 7/10/2018, about 4 days before deceased Allabakhsh informed Fahim Shaikh about dispute between himself and Jakir Shaikh on the unloading of vehicles carrying scrap. On 7/10/2008 Allabakhsh visited medical shop at 11.00 p.m. and at about 11.20 p.m. he was on his way to his residence. When he was passing by Road No.13 and turning towards lane, he was assaulted by accused No.1-Khurshid @ Mullani Harun Shaikh, accused No.2- Soheb Asifali Kazi, accused No.3-Alpraj @ Tantan, accused No.4-Sunil @ Papa and accused No.5-Iliyas @ Illu. Dawood Parkar and Jahir Idris then standing on road near house of Dawood Parkar saw them assaulting Allabaksh with weapons like bamboo, dragger, knife and chopper. After attack they ran away with weapons. Jahir Idris and Dawood Ibrahim (PW-4 and PW-5) both went to the spot and found Allabaksh with multiple injuries in pool of blood. Allabaksh was then shifted to hospital at Rajwadi where he was declared dead.
4. Rajwadi hospital informed Shivaji Nagar Police Station at 11.40 a.m. and PSI Gadhave on duty went to hospital prepared inquest panchanama. He recorded statement of Mohd. Farooq Siddiqui (PW-2) which was subsequently treated as FIR and Crime No.316/2008 was registered against accused. During investigation criminal conspiracy to commit murder of Allabaksh came to surface. After arrest of respective accused blood stained clothes and consequent to discovery under section 27 of the Evidence Act blood stained weapons were seized. PW-2 produced mobile handset of deceased Allabaksh on 12/10/2018 and police collected CDR. Charge-sheet was then submitted to the competent Court. After the matter was committed to Sessions Court, Court of Sessions at Sewree in Sessions Case No.51/2009 framed 7 charges which are as under:
FIRSTLY: That you accused Nos.1 to 8 alongwith absconding accused Jakir Hussain Shaikh on 7/10/2008 at 11.25 p.m. on the road between plots Nos.34 and 35, Baiganwadi, Govandi, Mumbai were members of an unlawful assembly, the common object of which was to commit murder of Hanif @ Allabaksh Allauddin Shaikh and thereby committed an offence punishable u/s.143 of I.P.C. and within my cognizance;
SECONDLY: That on the same date, time and place, you accused Nos.1 to 8 alongwith absconding accused Jakir Hussain Shaikh being armed with deadly weapons like chopper, knife, dagger and bamboo stick, which used as weapons of offence was likely to cause death, were members of an unlawful assembly and thereby committed an offence punishable u/s.144 of I.P.C. and within my cognizance;
THIRDLY: That on the same date, time and place, you accused Nos.1 to 8 alongwith absconding accused Jakir Hussain Shaikh were members of an unlawful assembly, and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.