Nutan D. Sardessai, J.

The petitioner is invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the order passed by the respondent No.4 under the Right to Information Act, 2005, (the Act for short hereinafter).

2. Heard learned Counsels for the parties and the respondent No.1 in person. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with the consent of the learned Counsels appearing for the parties. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 waives service.

3. Shri. Ganesh Naik, learned Advocate on behalf of the petitioner contended that the Order dated 05.07.2018 passed by the respondent No.4 was challenged by the petitioner in the present petition, being a nullity in law, and seeking it to be quashed and set aside. It was his contention that an application was moved by the respondent No.1 under Section 6(1) of the Act, seeking the personal particulars of the petitioner, vis-a-vis his date of appointment, working hours, educational qualifications, details of higher education, so on and so forth in that connection. The petitioner had filed a reply to the respondent No.2 whereby he had raised serious objection to the furni