SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 619

MANISH PITALE
Datta Ganpat Kamble – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.N. Patre, Adv., S.B. Bissa, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Manish Pitale, J.

The petitioner herein, who was elected directly as a Sarpanch as also a Member of Ward No.1 of Gram Panchayat Indira Nagar, tahsil Pusad, district Yavatmal, has challenged order dated 23.01.2018 passed by the respondent no.1 - Additional Collector, whereby it has been held that the petitioner stands disqualified from both the posts by operation of Section 13A of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, (for short "Act") as he failed to resign from either of the posts within the stipulated period of seven days from the date of declaration of result of election.

2. The facts leading up to filing of the present writ petition are that the elections were held for the said Gram Panchayat wherein the petitioner contested for the post of Member of the Gram Panchayat from Ward No.1 and also for the post of Sarpanch, who after the amendment of 2017 in the aforesaid Act, was to be elected directly by the voters. The petitioner was elected both as a Sarpanch and also as Member from Ward No.1. The result of the election was declared on 09.10.2017 and it was published by the respondent no.2 on the Gram Panchyat notice board on 11.10.2017. According to the petitione













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top