Manish Pitale, J.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties. This writ petition was initially dismissed by this Court by judgment and order dated 28.09.2017. But, thereafter application for review was filed by the petitioner, which stood allowed by order dated 05.09.2018 and the writ petition was restored for being considered on merits again. This is how the present writ petition came up for final hearing again and it has been considered on merits by this Court.

2. The grievance of the petitioner in the present case is that the respondent no.4 herein was wrongly promoted to the post of the Headmaster on 31.05.2014 in the respondent no.3 School and that by proper application of law to the facts of the present case, respondent nos. 4 to 7 should all have been treated as junior to him and that he was entitled to be appointed in the post of Headmaster, being the senior most teacher in the respondent no.3 School. The petitioner is aggrieved by the dismissal of his appeal on 01.01.2016 by the impugned order passed by the School Tribunal, Amravati, whereby his contentions have been rejected. It is the case