SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 673

VIBHA KANKANWADI
Satish Dhudku Halnor – Appellant
Versus
Yogita Satish Halnor – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.C. Sant, Adv., K.S. Patil, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

1. Present appeal has been filed by the original petitioner-husband challenging the concurrent Judgment and Decree against him. He had filed Hindu Marriage Petition No.327/2010 before 2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Jalgaon under Section 13 (1) (ia) and (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of marriage. It is not in dispute that petitioner and respondent are the husband and wife and their marriage was solemnized on 11.12.2001 as per Hindu rites and customs. They have son by name Anand. Petitioner was employed in police even prior to the marriage. It is also not in dispute that petitioner had issued notice for dissolution of marriage on 15.04.2003 to the respondent and it was replied by the respondent. Petitioner had filed Marriage Petition No.112/2003 for dissolution of marriage, but then it was compromised. It is also not in dispute that the respondent-wife had lodged First Information Report for the offence punishable under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner and his family members. It was compromised during the pendency of the said criminal case. In spite of the settlement of the dispute, she lodged report





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top