VIBHA KANKANWADI
Satish Dhudku Halnor – Appellant
Versus
Yogita Satish Halnor – Respondent
VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.
1. Present appeal has been filed by the original petitioner-husband challenging the concurrent Judgment and Decree against him. He had filed Hindu Marriage Petition No.327/2010 before 2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Jalgaon under Section 13 (1) (ia) and (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of marriage. It is not in dispute that petitioner and respondent are the husband and wife and their marriage was solemnized on 11.12.2001 as per Hindu rites and customs. They have son by name Anand. Petitioner was employed in police even prior to the marriage. It is also not in dispute that petitioner had issued notice for dissolution of marriage on 15.04.2003 to the respondent and it was replied by the respondent. Petitioner had filed Marriage Petition No.112/2003 for dissolution of marriage, but then it was compromised. It is also not in dispute that the respondent-wife had lodged First Information Report for the offence punishable under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner and his family members. It was compromised during the pendency of the said criminal case. In spite of the settlement of the dispute, she lodged report
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.