SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 710

VIBHA KANKANWADI
Dhondiba – Appellant
Versus
Maruti – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.D. Sapkal, Adv., R.A. Deshmukh, Adv., S.J. Salunke, Adv., R.G. Hange, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

1. Present appeal has been filed by the legal heirs of original plaintiff No.1. Plaintiff had filed Regular Civil Suit No.230 of 1982 before Civil Judge, Junior Division, Beed for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction.

2. The plaintiff along with original defendant No.2, who was later on deleted by order dated 22-08-1989, had come with a case that, they are the owners of portion of land Survey No.16/E/5 and Survey No.22/E/6 admeasuring 12 Acres 12 Gunthas and 10.06 Gunthas respectively situated at village Karchundi Tq. Dist. Beed. It is stated that, they are the joint owners and possessors of the suit land shown in the map appended to the land in Red colour. It was their ancestral property. They are in actual possession and cultivation of the same since their forefathers. Their names have been recorded in the revenue record. Defendants No.1 and 2 are the real brothers inter se. They have no right, title and interest over the suit lands. However, in collusion with each other, they are interested in denying the ownership of the plaintiffs as well as disturbing the possession of the plaintiffs over the suit land. By way of amendment, defendant


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top