B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.

1. Appellant Deepak @ Anna Sitaram Kate in Criminal Appeal No.560/2012 happened to be accused No.1 while his parents happened to be accused Nos.2 and 3 in Sessions Case No.95/2010 on the file of Extra Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati. That Court vide Judgment delivered on 27/3/2012 acquitted accused No.2 and 3 and punished accused No.1 for offence punishable under section 302 of IPC and sentenced him to suffer life imprisonment. For offence under section 307 of IPC he has been sentenced to suffer RI for 10 years. Accused No.1 Deepak has challenged his conviction in Appeal No.560/2012 while the State of Maharashtra has challenged acquittal of accused Nos.2 and 3 in Criminal Appeal No.640/2013.

2. Deceased Sachin was cousin of Deepak i.e. his father Navnath is the brother of accused No.2. Injured Rukhmini is the wife of Navnath and the mother of deceased Sachin. The case of prosecution is agricultural field belonging to father Sampat of Sitaram and Navnath was partitioned between them by Sampat. Sitaram always felt that he got less share and hence there used to be quarrel between him and Navnath.

3. Murder of Sachin has taken