Bharati H. Dangre, J.

The petitioner, a Company registered under the Companies Act and engaged in the business of providing facility of Management services including the mechanized house keeping and technical services, has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court being aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities to revise the reimbursement to the petitioner in light of the increase in the rates of minimum wages and to neutralize the petitioner for the increase in cost of labour in terms of the agreement executed between the petitioner and respondent railway. The grievance of the petitioner revolves around the nature of his contract, which is labour intensive and the cause of action of the petitioner is the refusal to neutralize the petitioner for the significant increase in the minimum wages by the respondent no.3 Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India by issuing a notification under the Minimum Wages Act.

It is the specific case of the petitioner that in the absence of such an action on the part of the respondents, the petitioner is required to make payment of increased wages which incurs him a huge financial liability, almost cau