SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Bom) 2057

ROHIT B.DEO
Jay Gramgita Gramin Bigarsheti – Appellant
Versus
Mohammad Latif – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shri S.V. Sirpurkar.
For the Respondent: Shri B.J. Lonare.

JUDGMENT :

Rohit B. Deo, J.

1. The original complainant in Criminal Complaint Case 1482/2004 instituted under the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ("Act" for short) is challenging the judgment and order dated 19.07.2006 rendered by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hinganghat, by and under which, the respondent original accused is acquitted of offence punishable under Section 138 of the Act.

2. The complainant is a society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The complaint under Section 138 of the Act was preferred contending that the accused was sanctioned loan of Rs. 40,000/- on 31.01.2003 for business purpose. The accused availed the loan amount after executing the loan documents. The accused defaulted in repayment of loan. The accused issued cheque 045891 dated 15.02.2004 for Rs. 17,000/- towards part payment of the outstanding. The said cheque which was drawn on Wana Nagarik Sahakari Bank Ltd. Hinganghat was presented for encashment on 12.03.2004, the cheque was dishonoured, statutory notice was issued and since there was no compliance the complaint was instituted.

3. The complainant examined himself and Sachin Patange (CW-2) Passing O

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top