SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 935

M.G.GIRATKAR
Ushadevi Manikrao Baradkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.B. Nakshane, Adv., Shamsi Haider, Adv., P.B. Patil, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

M.G. Giratkar, J.

The present appeal is against the judgment of reference Court in L.A.C. No. 459/2005.

2. The land owner challenged the award of Land Acquisition Officer in respect of acquisition of land of Gat No. 75 of Village Barad, Tq. Babhulgaon, District Yavatmal which was acquired for Bembla Projet. Land Acquisition Officer granted compensation at the rate of Rs. 82,222/- per hectare for 0.66 H.R. and Rs. 21,551/- per hectare for 2.63 H.R. Land Acquisition Officer granted compensation in respect of food bearing trees at the rate of Rs. 1360/- per tree for 682 sweet lime trees, Rs. 1296/- per tree for 30 guava trees, Rs. 483/- per tree for 10 lemon trees, Rs. 350/- for one orange tree and Rs. 515/- per tree for 7 berry trees. Land Acquisition Officer granted Rs. 6247/- for valuation of pipe line.

3. In the reference Court, land owner examined valuer Shri Subhash Ramrao Tayade. He has stated in his evidence that he personally went to the field of appellant, measured trees and opined that the appellant is entitled for compensation as stated below.

For 682 Swee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top