IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
S.S. SHINDE, R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
Niwas - Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 477 of 2013
Decided On : 02-02-2019
Indian Penal Code,1860 – Section 302 r/w 34 – Offence of Murder – Setting ablaze - Deceased was a 16 year old girl studying in Class 10th - She hailed from village - She had been staying at her maternal grand-parents’ home at village for schooling - She did not have maternal uncle - Parents of deceased had migrated to Pune to eke out their living - Appellant hailed from village - He would love deceased - She had spurned his advances - Deceased was alone home - Appellant with his two/three friends came deceased home - They questioned her as to why she did not love appellant - Appellant on her reply, sprinkled kerosene on her person - One of the others accompanying appellant, lighted match-stick and set her ablaze - She raised cries - Appellant and others ran away - Before leaving, they closed the door - On hearing the cries, neighbours gathered - Grand-mother (PW 4) was away in field - She too rushed home - On her enquiry, she told to have been set ablaze by four boys – Deceased grand-father was out of village - Neighbours rushed deceased to Primary Health Centre, and then she was shifted to Hospital - There is a police outpost at premises of Hospital - Police Constable on duty, was informed - PW 7 went to the ward wherein deceased was admitted - On his request, Medical Officer on duty examined and certified her to be fit and conscious to make a statement - PW 7 recorded statement - She told PW 7 to have been set ablaze by appellant and his two friends - Deceased statement was treated as first information report - Based on the same, crime for the offence under Section 307 of I.P.C. came to be registered - Both the FIR and the statement became deceased dying declarations - Whether the dying declaration was properly recorded and whether it was voluntary and truthful – Held, court are afraid as to how this inconsistency would lead to disbelieve prosecution case in its entirety - It was also submitted by learned Counsel for appellant that C.A. report is silent to indicate existence of carbon particles, so as to attribute the case to be of setting ablaze with kerosene - It appears that it was a faint submission - Though carbon particles were not detected, C.A. Report undoubtedly, indicates that kerosene residues were detected with deceased hair - Evidence of the aforesaid four witnesses indicate that deceased had stated them one more name as person involved along with others three, to set her ablaze - Trial Court has rightly acquitted - As stated herein above, written dying declarations would prevail over the oral dying declarations stated to have been made to these four witnesses - Here again, it is stated that the statements of these witnesses have been recorded by the Investigating Officer little over three days after incident - Mere fact of implicating one in the offence would not materially affect evidence that was available against the remaining three - Oral dying declarations are also found to be not so inconsistent with written dying declarations - There is a common thread to suggest involvement of the appellant - Court found the written dying declarations to be voluntary, untutored and made during conscious state of mind - Trial Court has rightly convicted appellant - Court do not find any reason to disagree with findings recorded by the trial Court - Appeal fail - Appeal is dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
R.G. Avachat, J.
1. The challenge in this appeal is to the judgment and order dated 22.11.2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, in Sessions Case No. 25 of 2008. By the impugned judgment and order, the appellant herein has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 r/w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code ("I.P.C.", for short) and sentenced to suffer life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/-. In default of payment of fine, he has been directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two months.
Two more persons were charged and prosecuted along with the appellant herein for the same offence. Both of them have been acquitted. The State has not preferred appeal against their acquittal. In fact, one more accused was there. Since he was found to be a juvenile in conflict with law, has been dealt with by the Juvenile Justice Board.
2. The facts, in brief, giving rise to the present appeal are as follows:-
Poonam (deceased) was a 16 year old girl studying in Class 10th. She hailed from village Sabla, Tq. Kaij, Dist. Beed. She had, however, been staying at her maternal grand-parents' home at village Kalegaon for schooling. She did not have maternal uncle. The parents of Poonam had migrated to Pune to eke out their living.
The appellant-Niwas hailed from village Kalegaon. He would love Poonam. She had, however, spurned his advances. On 26.12.2007, Poonam was alone home. It was between 01.00 p.m. and 02.00 p.m. The appellant with his two/three friends (Sangharsh and Suresh) came Poonam's home. They questioned her as to why she did not love the appellant. The appellant on her reply, sprinkled kerosene on her person. One of the others accompanying the appellant, lighted match-stick and set Poonam ablaze. She raised cries. The appellant and others, therefore, ran away. Before leaving, they closed the door (not bolted).
On hearing the cries, neighbors gathered. The grand-mother of Poonam (PW 4-Avida) was away in the field. She too rushed home. On her enquiry with Poonam, she told to have been set ablaze by four boys. Poonam's grand-father was out of the village. The neighbors rushed Poonam to the Primary Health Centre, Kaij and then she was shifted to Swami Ramanand Tirth Rural College and Hospital, at Ambajogai (hereinafter referred to as "S.R.T.R. Hospital"). There is a police outpost at the premises of S.R.T.R. Hospital, at Ambajogai. Police Constable (PW 7-Jyotiram) on duty, was informed. PW 7-Jyotiram went to the ward wherein Poonam was admitted. On his request, the Medical Officer on duty examined Poonam and certified her to be fit and conscious to make a statement. PW 7-Jyotiram recorded Poonam's statement (Exh. 82). She told PW 7-Jyotiram to have been set ablaze by the appellant and his two friends Sangharsh and Suresh. Poonam's statement was treated as first information report. Based on the same, crime for the offence under Section 307 of I.P.C. came to be registered. On the same day, the Taluka Executive Magistrate recorded Poonam's statement (Exh. 93). Both the FIR and the statement became Poonam's dying declarations. The parents of Poonam came to the hospital. They were accompanied by Poonam's maternal aunt. On enquiry, Poonam stated them to have been set ablaze by the appellant, the acquitted accused and one Sangharsh (who has been dealt with by Juvenile Justice Board).
3. Investigation of the crime was taken up by PW 12-P.S.I., Premnath. He visited the scene of offence and drew the scene of offence panchnama (Exh. 65). Kerosene can and half burnt clothes came to be seized under Muddemal Pavati (Exh. 2). On the next day, Poonam succumbed to burn injuries. Her dead body was subjected to post mortem, report whereof indicates that Poonam died of "shock due to burns". Offence of murder came to be registered replacing the offence under Section 307 of the I.P.C. PW 12-A.S.I. Premnath, Investigating Officer, recorded statement of the persons connected with the facts and circumstances of
Panchanand Mandal alias Pachan Mandal and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Surinder Kumar Vs. State of Haryana
Sudhakar and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Shorab Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
State of Haryana Vs. Bhagirath
State of Gujarat Vs. Jayrajbhai Punjabhai Varu
State of Gujarat Vs. Jayrajbhai Punjabhai Varu
Sandeep and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana
Bharwada Bhogin Bhai Hirjibhai Vs. State of Gujarat
Khushal Rao Vs. State of Bombay
Leela Ram Vs. State of Haryana
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.