SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 965

T.V.NALAWADE, K.K.SONAWANE
Amit Harising Rathod – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kirti Ahuja, Adv., K.S. Patil, Adv., A.S. Radikar, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

K.K. Sonawane, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally, with the consent of learned counsel for parties.

2. The applicants preferred present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ("Cr.P.C.") seeking relief to quash and set aside the First Information Report ("FIR") bearing No. 116 of 2018 registered at Upnagar Police Station, Nandurbar District Nandurbar, for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 315, 323 and 504 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code ("IPC") and all other consequential proceeding arising thereof including final Report under Section 173 of Cr.P.C. dated 02-01-2019.

3. The prosecution case in short compass is that, the first informant Jagruti Amit Rathod W/o Amit Harising Rathod on 14-07-2018 visited to the Police of Upanagar, Police Station, Nandurbar, District Nandurbar and filed the report that when she was studying in College, she developed intimacy with applicant Amit. It has been alleged that while examination of Engineering was going on, the applicant- husband and complainant on 05-04-2004 eloped to Pune and got married on 08- 04-2004. Since then complainant had no relations with her parents. Accor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top