2019 Supreme(Bom) 1030
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT NAGPUR
Rohit B. Deo, J.
Sheikh Asif – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Criminal Appeal Nos. 2, 43 of 2017
Decided On : 03-07-2019
Advocate Appeared:
Sweety Bhatia, N.B. Jawade, Rajneesh Vyas.
Headnote:
Indian Penal Code,1860 – Section 489-C,489(B),511 and 489-B r/w 34 – Criminal Procedure Code,1973 – Section 292 - Fake currency notes - Counterfeit currency - PW-1 - API - one received secret information that one slim person is coming towards railway station with one bag containing fake currency notes - PW-1 informed his superior officer, recorded information in the station diary, summoned two panchas and proceeded towards railway Station in a private vehicle - In the interregnum, PW-1 also summoned a photographer and video recorder - PW-1 reached railway station - One person, who was identified as suspect, came from railway station and went towards - PW-1 and others entered Bhojnalaya and found suspect sitting at one table - PW-1 approached suspect with panchas and introduced himself - Bag which was in possession of suspect was searched and a bundle of currency notes of denomination was found wrapped in polythene bag - Bundle contained currency notes - Suspect disclosed his name - He further disclosed that he procured currency notes from West Bengal - PW-1 suspected that the notes are counterfeit currency and sealed them in presence of panchas - Personal search of A-1 was taken and one mobile phone, election card, railway ticket and clothes were seized - Sealed currency notes were seized and seizure panchnama was recorded - PW-1 then approached State Bank of India, and asked manager to verify genuineness or otherwise of the currency notes - Manager orally opined that currency notes are counterfeit currency - Manager however expressed inability to opine in writing - Currency notes were again sealed - PW-1 returned to Police Station and lodged report on basis of which Crime was registered – Held, in the light of the discussion supra, court impelled to hold that prosecution has not proved offence beyond reasonable doubt - Court have already observed that the investigation is casual and shoddy - Material witnesses have not been examined - Material evidence is not produced - Complainant PW-1 who has acted as Investigating Officer has done immense dis-service to prosecution and to justice dispensation system - It would be appropriate if the Director General of Police appoints a responsible officer to conduct in-depth inquiry so that accountability for lapses in investigation can be fixed, guilty officer punished and remedial measures taken - Learned Additional Public Prosecutor is requested to bring this judgment to the notice of Director General of Police, State of Maharashtra within two weeks and inquiry shall be completed and compliance report submitted to Registry of this Court within four weeks thereafter - Judgment rendered by District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, in Sessions Trial is set aside and accused are acquitted of offence punishable under section 489-B, 489-C of the Indian Penal Code - appeals are allowed
JUDGMENT :
Rohit B. Deo, J.
1. Criminal Appeal 43 of 2017 is preferred by accused A-1 - Sheikh Asif Sheikh Usmal and Criminal Appeal 2 of 2017 is preferred by accused A-2 - Abdul Khalik Sheikh Abaid Ali, who are convicted for offence punishable under section 489-B read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code ("IPC") and are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to payment of fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default to suffer simple imprisonment for six months, and are further convicted for the offence punishable under section 489-C of the IPC and are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and to payment of fine of Rs. 10,000/- each and in default to suffer imprisonment for six months, vide judgment dated 16.5.2016 rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Case 12 of 2015. Accused A-3 Mohammd Iqbal who also faced trial for the said offences, is acquitted.
2. I have heard the learned counsel Ms. Sweety Bhatia for the accused in Criminal Appeal 43 of 2017 and the learned counsel Shri Rajneesh Vyas for the accused in Criminal Appeal 2 of 2017 and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor Shri N.B. Jawade for the respondent/State.
3. The case of the prosecution, as is unfolded during the course of trial is that PW-1 - API - Nishikant Ramteke received secret information on 24.7.2015 that one slim person is coming towards Wardha railway station with one bag containing fake currency notes. PW-1 Nishikant informed his superior officer, recorded the information in the station diary, summoned two panchas and proceeded towards the Wardha railway Station in a private vehicle. In the interregnum, PW-1 also summoned a photographer and video recorder. PW-1 reached the Wardha railway station between 10.30 to 10.45 a.m. One person, who was identified as the suspect, came from the railway station and went towards Satkar Bhojnalaya. PW-1 and others entered Satkar Bhojnalaya and found the suspect sitting at one table. PW-1 approached the suspect with the panchas and introduced himself. The bag which was in possession of the suspect was searched and a bundle of currency notes of Rs. 500/- denomination was found wrapped in polythene bag. The bundle contained 385 currency notes. The suspect disclosed his name as Sheikh Asif Sheikh Usman R/o Pusad, District Yavatmal (A-1). He further disclosed that he procured the currency notes from West Bengal. PW-1 suspected that the notes are counterfeit currency and sealed them in the presence of panchas. Personal search of A-1 was taken and one mobile phone of Karbonn company, election card, railway ticket and clothes were seized. The sealed currency notes were seized and seizure panchanama was recorded.
4. PW-1 Nishikant then approached State Bank of India, Branch Wardha, and asked the manager to verify the genuineness or otherwise of the currency notes. The manager orally opined that the currency notes are counterfeit currency. The manager however expressed inability to opine in writing. The currency notes were again sealed. PW-1 returned to the Police Station and lodged report on the basis of which Crime 342 of 2014 was registered.
5. In view of the disclosure made by A-1 during interrogation, the police arrested accused Mohasin Khan from Pusad and accused Mohd. Iqbal - A3 from Amravati. While in custody, on 1.8.2014, accused 1 revealed the role of A-2 - Abdul Khalik. The Investigating Officer asked A1 to telephonically call A-2. Accordingly, A-1 called A-2 and during the conversation the mobile phone was on speaker and recording mode. The panchas were present. A-2 Abdul Khalik asked A1 - Sheikh Asif to deposit Rs. 40,000/- in his bank account and asked A-1 to meet him at hotel Banjara in Howrah-West Bengal. The memory chip was seized as evidence of the recorded conversation.
6. The Investigating Officer and his staff accompanied A 1 to Howrah. The Investigating Officer requested the jurisdictional police station for assistance, which was provided. The Investiga