SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 1045

ROHIT B.DEO
Ranjitsingh Gulabsingh Chungade – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Mardikar, Adv., S.G. Joshi, Adv., C.A. Lokhande, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Rohit B. Deo, J.

1. The appellant is assailing the judgment of conviction dated 30-6-2017 rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in Sessions Trial 234/2002.

2. The appellant, who shall be hereinafter referred to as the accused, and one Bajrang faced trial for offences punishable under Sections 353, 294, 506 and 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 read with 4 of the Arms Act.

3. The co-accused Bajrang is convicted for offence punishable under Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months and to payment of fine of Rs. 500/-. Bajrang is further convicted for offence punishable under Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months and to payment of fine of Rs. 500/- and is further convicted for offence punishable under Section 294 of the Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months and to payment of fine of Rs.500/-. It is stated at the bar that the accused Bajrang has not preferred an appeal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top