SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 1057

SANDEEP K.SHINDE
Savita Vijaykumar Gumte – Appellant
Versus
Shivaji Malu Harale – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Samir Kumbhakoni, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep K. Shinde, J.

Heard learned counsel for petitioner.

2. Though the respondents are served, they have not caused their appearance.

3. Petitioner (plaintiff) instituted Special Suit No. 156 of 2010 new no. 303 of 2012 ('previous suit' for short) for specific performance of contract dated 04.03.2005, against Shivaji Harale. Shivaji passed away on 02.05.2011 and thereupon his wife and others were brought on record as his legal representatives, as defendants. These defendants brought Regular Civil Suit No. 579 of 2012 (subsequent suit) for declaration that contract dated 04.03.2005 executed by Shivaji in favour of plaintiff, was security documents against the loan.

4. Since in both the suit contract dated 04.03.2005 is under consideration; plaintiff filed an application under Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code for stay of suit in the subsequent suit No. 579 of 2012, which Trial Court rejected. Hence, this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

5. Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code reads as under :-

No Court shall proceed with the trial of any suit in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top