SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 1070

A.S.CHANDURKAR
Rajendra Shivsing Chanda – Appellant
Versus
Additional Commissioner, Amravati – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
P.A. Kadu, A.V. Palshikar, N.A. Gawande.

JUDGMENT :

A.S. Chandurkar, J.

1. Rule. Heard finally with consent of counsel for the parties.

2. An order condoning delay in filing an appeal under Section 16(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 (for short, the said Act) challenging the order rejecting the disqualification proceedings filed against each petitioner from continuing as Member of the Gram Panchayat is under challenge in these writ petitions.

3. The facts in brief are that the disqualification of each petitioner was sought under provisions of Section 14(1)(j-3) of the said Act on the ground that encroachment had been committed on Government land as a result of which each petitioner was not entitled to continue as Member of the Gram Panchayat. The Additional Collector while adjudicating said proceedings recorded a finding that encroachment as alleged by the respondent no. 4- complainant had not been proved and hence the proceedings for disqualification came to be dismissed. An appeal came to be filed by the complainant but beyond the period of fifteen days as stipulated by the provisions of Section 16(2) of the said Act. In the said proceedings, a preliminary objection was raised by each petitioner that as th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top