SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 1071

ROHIT B.DEO
Manish – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
M.S. Wakil, N.B. Jawade.

JUDGMENT :

Rohit B. Deo, J.

1. The appellant - who shall be referred to as the accused hereinafter - is assailing the judgment dated 26.9.2017 rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge - 1, Nagpur in Special Child Protection Case 128 of 2013 whereby the accused is convicted for the offence punishable under section 6, read with section 5(n) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act ("POCSO Act") and is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to payment of fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for one year.

2. The victim, then aged 13 years lodged report at Police Station Mauda on 10.8.2013 (Exh.25) pursuant to which offences punishable under section 6 of the POCSO Act and section 376(2) (f)(i) of the Indian Penal Code ("IPC") were registered against the accused vide crime 129 of 2013.

3. The gist of the report, which is lodged by the victim who was accompanied by her mother Smt. Pushpa (PW-2) is thus:

The victim was studying in the 9th standard at Shrinath Vidyalaya, Mahalgaon, her father was suffering from epilepsy and expired 5 years ago. Since then, the victim her mother, sister-Priya (PW-7), brother Prashant and th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top