SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 1202

K.R.SHRIRAM
Aglowmed Limited – Appellant
Versus
Aglow Pharmaceuticals Private Limited – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Mahesh A. Mahadgut a/w. Ms. Poonam Teddu i/b. Mr. Mahesh A. Mahadgut.
For the Respondent: Mr. A.W. Ansari.

JUDGMENT :

1. Plaintiff has approached this Court seeking (a) permanent injunction against defendant from using in relation to its business of manufacturing, marketing, selling, trading, exporting medicinal and pharmaceutical preparations and substances using the trading name 'AGLOW' or any other trading name or mark as part of its trading style or corporate name that is identical and/or deceptively similar to plaintiff's trading name/mark/trading style/corporate name 'AGLOWMED' and/or using the word 'AGLOW' or and other word/name/mark identical and/or deceptively similar to plaintiff's mark 'AGLOWMED' and prevent defendant from infringing the registered trade mark of plaintiff 'AGLOWMED' bearing no.415401 dated 02.01.1984 and (b) to restrain defendant from using the trading name 'AGLOW' or and other word/name/mark identical and/or deceptively similar to plaintiff's mark 'AGLOWMED' in relation to defendant's medicinal and/or pharmaceutical preparations so as to pass off defendant's business or goods as plaintiff's goods. Plaintiff is also claiming damages in the sum of Rs.5,00,0

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top