R.M.BORDE, MANGESH S.PATIL
Charushila D/o Tukaram Chaudhari – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, through its Principal Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.M. BORDE, J.
1. In this group of petitions, the question, that arises for consideration, is as regards methodology of filling in the vacancies prescribed for horizontal reservation which flows from Article 16(1) of the Constitution of India. Another question, that would be required to be considered is, as to whether rule of migration/shifting can be applied and to what extent.
2. In Writ Petition No. 4159 of 2018, the petitioners are objecting to the Government Circular dated 13.08.2014 and are also praying to quash Clause 19 recorded in the call letters issued to them. The petitioners participated in the process of selection conducted by the Maharashtra Public Service Commission for filling up vacancies for the posts of Deputy Collector, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Assistant Commissioner of Police and such other posts. The posts have been earmarked under the advertisement for various vertical and horizontal reservation categories. The petitioners appeared for main examination and have been declared qualified for the interview, which was scheduled on 09.04.2018. It is recorded in the call letters issued to the petitioners, “while filling up the posts from horizontal
Anil Kumar Gupta vs. State of U.P. and Others
Bihari Lal Rada vs. Anil Jain (Tinu) and Others
Deepa E.V. vs. Union of India and others
Gaurav Pradhan and Others vs. State of Rajasthan and Others
Jitendra Kumar Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.