N.J.JAMADAR
Parasmal Daulatram Jain – Appellant
Versus
Rameshwar Rathanlal Karwa – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N.J. Jamadar, J.
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and, with the consent of the Counsels for the parties, heard finally.
2. This petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India takes exception to an order dated 17th January, 2018, passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Bombay, in Notice of Motion No.71 of 2017 in Suit No.7057 of 2005, whereby the learned Judge allowed the Notice of Motion and permitted the defendant-respondent to file written statement dated 24th March, 2015, by condoning the delay of 9 years and 79 days, subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/- by the defendant to the plaintiff-petitioner.
3. The petition arises in the backdrop of the following facts:
Allen vs. Sir Alfred McAlpine & Sons
C.N. Ramappa Gowda vs. C. C. Chandregowda (dead) by LRs and another.
Mohammed Yusuf vs. Fai Mohammad & others
Mohammed Yusuf vs. Faiz Mohammad & ors.
M/s. Aditya Hotels (P) Ltd. vs. Bombay Swadeshi Stores Ltd. & ors.
R. N. Jadi and Brothers and others vs. Subhashchandra
Suresh s/o Daduram Abnave vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.