SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 1483

M.G.GIRATKAR
Sharifabee Mohd Sharif – Appellant
Versus
Vinayak K. Zade – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ambatkar, Adv., Holding, Adv., W.G. Paunikar, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

M.G. Giratkar, J.

This is an appeal fled by the claimants for enhancement of compensation.

The facts giving rise to the present appeal, in short, are as under:-

2. On 22nd April, 2007, Mohd. Sharif Shaikh Mehboob was going by his Hero Honda motorcycle bearing Registration No. MH-27/W-2357 from Jamil Colonhy to Asir Colony, Amravati. The offending truck bearing Registration No. MH-31/AP-7782 came from Walgaon side in a high speed and gave a dash to the motorcycle. Mohd. Sharif was seriously injured and died on the spot. The deceased was aged about 57 years. He was working as a conductor in the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation and earning Rs. 11,426/- per month.

3. The claimants/legal heirs of deceased Mohd. Sharif fled Claim Petition No. 229 of 2007 before the Claims Tribunal, Amravati. The Claims Tribunal, Amravati, granted compensation of Rs.3,96,700- 00. Hence, the present appeal for enhancement of compensation.

4. Heard learned Adv. Shri Ambatkar holding for Adv. Shri P.R. Agrawal for the appellants. Learned Adv. has pointed out the decision in the case of

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
        whatsapp-icon Back to top