S.V.GANGAPURWALA, ANIL S.KILOR
Dattatray Yedu Thombre – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S. V. Gangapurwala, J.
The petitioners in these petitions assail the Ordinance No.XXII of 2019 dated 23.08.2019 promulgated by the State of Maharashtra for extending the election of President, Vice President and Chairman of subject Committees of some Zilla Parishads and Chairman and Vice Chairman of Panchayat Samitis on account of the ensuing General Election of the State Legislative Assembly.
2. The petitions are based on similar set of facts and involve common question of law. To avoid rigmarole are decided by common judgment.
3. Ms. Talekar, learned counsel eruditely made submissions. The other learned counsels viz. Mr. N. P. Patil Jamalpurkar, Mr. S. S. Deshmukh and Mr. Bachate echoed the arguments of Ms. Talekar and also put forth their stand. The contentions of the learned counsel for petitioners are as under:
Ambedkarite Party Vs. State of Maharashtra
Babaji Kondaji Garad Vs. The Nasik Merchants Co-Operative Banks Ltd., Nasik & Ors.
Bhagwan Sampatrao Ghodmare and Anr. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bhanumati and Others Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Dwarkadas Shrinivas of Bombay Vs. The Sholapur Spinning and Weaving Co. Ltd. and Others
Kishansing Tomar Vs. Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad and Ors.
Krishna Kumar Singh Vs. State of Bihar and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.