SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 1563

K.K.TATED
Priti Rakesh Parmar – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Rupsingh Parmar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ghanshyam B. Sakpal, Adv., Satish Yadav, Adv., Pravin Patel, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

K.K. Tated, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Advocate Mr. Pravin Patel submits that, he received instruction to appear on behalf of the Respondent. He submits that, he requires six weeks time to file Vakalatnama as well as reply with copy to other side.

3. By this Misc. Civil Application under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Applicant-wife is seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No. 244 of 2018 filed by Respondent-Husband under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, for divorce before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Vasai, District Palghar to Civil Judge, Senior Division Nashik, District Nashik for hearing and final disposal on its own merits.

4. The Advocate for the respondent requires six weeks time to file an affidavit-in-reply. Two weeks time is granted to file affidavit in reply with copy to other side. Rejoinder, if any, to file within two weeks thereafter copy to other side.

5. Matter to appear on board on 07th November, 2019.

6. Till the next date, the ad-interim relief is granted in terms of prayer clause (c) which reads thus:-

    "(c). Pending the hearing and final disposal of the present Misc. Application this Hon'ble Court be plea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top