IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Sarang V. Kotwal, J.
Vernon – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Criminal Bail Application No. 3007 of 2018
Decided On : 15-10-2019
JUDGMENT :
Sarang V. Kotwal, J.
1. The applicant is seeking his release on bail pending trial in connection with C.R. No. 4/2018 registered at Vishrambaug Police Station, Pune. The charge-sheet is already filed. The charge-sheet is filed against the applicant for commission of offences punishable under Sections 121, 121A, 124A, 153A, 505(1)(b), 117, 120B read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1872 (hereinafter referred to as I.P.C. ) and under Sections 13, 16, 17, 18, 18B, 20, 38, 39, 40 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, as amended in 2008 and 2012 (hereinafter referred to as UAPA).
2. The applicant was arrested on 28.8.2018. Initially he was kept under house-arrest. As of today, the applicant is in judicial custody. The charge-sheet is already filed against him.
3. The State of Maharashtra has opposed this application. On behalf of the State, the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Yerwada Division, Pune, Dr. Shivaji Panditrao Pawar has filed his affidavit dated 1.4.2019. For the sake of convenience, this affidavit is hereinafter referred to as States affidavit. On behalf of the applicant, rejoinder to this affidavit is filed.
BRIEF HISTORY AND CASE OF THE INVESTIGATING AGENCY:
4. The FIR was lodged on 8.1.2018 at Vishrambaug Police Station by one Tushar Ramesh Damgude. The FIR was registered for commission of offences punishable under Sections 153A, 505(1)(b) and 117 read with 34 of IPC. According to the first informant, he was in the business of construction. Through a social networking site, he came to know that there was a programme at Shaniwar Wada, Pune on 31.12.2017 organized by Elgar Parishad. He attended that programme at around 2:00 p.m. on 31.12.2017. He further stated in the FIR that there were a few speakers, comperes, singers and other performers present on the stage. The informant was knowing Kabir Kala Manch and its members. He had read about them on social media and in the newspapers. He has further stated that some of the performers enacted short plays, performed dances and sung songs. According to him, the performances were provocative in nature and had effect of creating communal disharmony. At that time, some provocative speeches were delivered. A few objectionable and provocative books were kept for sale at the venue. It was his contention in the FIR that a banned organization-Communist Party of India (Maoist) [hereinafter referred to as CPI (Maoist)] was inciting violence by creating communal disharmony. According to him, the members of Kabir Kala Manch spread hatred through their songs, plays and speeches causing enmity between different communities. As a result, there were incidents of violence, arson and stone pelting near Bhima-Koregaon. Accordingly, the FIR was lodged naming six members of Kabir Kala Manch. The investigation progressed and based on the material gathered during investigation, Section 120B of IPC was added on 6.3.2018.
5. On 17.4.2018, the investigating agency conducted searches at the residences of eight persons, namely, (1) Rona Wilson, R/o Delhi, (2) Surendra Gadling, R/o Nagpur, (3) Sudhir Dhawale, R/o Mumbai, (4) Harshali Potdar, R/o Mumbai, (5) Sagar Gorakhe, R/o Pune, (6) Deepak Dhengale, R/o Pune, (7) Ramesh Gaychor, R/o Pune and (8) Jyoti Jagtap, R/o Pune. The residences of Shoma Sen and Mahesh Raut were searched on 6.6.2018.
6. It is the case of investigating agency that during the searches; documents were recovered from various computers/laptops/pen drives/memory cards. The seized articles were sent to Forensic Science Laboratory (for short, FSL) for analysis. The cloned copies were received. On the analysis of those cloned copies, aforementioned Sections of UAPA were applied on 17.5.2018.
7. It is the case of investigating agency, as set out in the States affidavit that, based upon the seized and recovered incriminating material, it was revealed that a few more
Arup Bhuyan vs. State of Assam
Gurcharan Singh vs. State (UT of Delhi)
Jayendra Saraswathi Swamigal vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs. Rajesh Ranjan
National Investigation Agency vs. Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.