JUDGMENT :

RAVINDRA V GHUGE, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the Judgment and Award dt. 18.06.2018, delivered by the Labour Court, Ahmednagar, by which Reference (I.D.A.) No. 02/2015, has been rejected.

3. This matter was heard at length on 16.09.2019 and after the submissions of the learned advocates were concluded, the learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that though the petitioner was terminated for pursuing higher education and had applied for leave, which was not considered, she is still willing to waive her back-wages from 21.06.2013 till September-2019, provided, she is reinstated in service with continuity.

4. The learned counsel for the respondent - Shri. Saibaba Sansthan, Shirdi, had sought time to take instructions in order to gather the response of the Management. Today, the learned advocate for the Management submits that, it is unable to consent to the relief of reinstatement without back-wages. Reliance is placed upon the judgment delivered by this Court in the matter of New India Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Shankar B. Bangera, (2006) 3 CLR 904.

5. Before I embark upon writ