A.S.GADKARI
Nayana Sudhir Shah – Appellant
Versus
Sudhir Premji Shah – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The present Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, takes an exception to the Order dated 31st January, 2017 passed by the Maintenance Officer and Assistant Commissioner Social Welfare, Mumbai City (Appellate Authority) under The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (for short, "the Said Act"), the Respondent No.2 herein, dismissing the Appeal No.277/2016-2017 preferred by the Petitioners under Section 16 of the said Act and confirming the Order dated 12th August 2016 passed by the Deputy Collector and Presiding Officer, Tribunal for Maintenance Of Parents and Senior Citizens, Mumbai City, i.e. Respondent No.3 herein.
2. Heard Mr. Dhakephalkar, learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioners, Mr. Thatte, learned counsel for the Respondent No.1 and Ms. Bane, learned AGP for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3. Perused the entire record annexed to the Petition.
3. The Petitioner No.1 is the wife of the Respondent No.1. The Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are the major children of the Petitioner No.1 and the Respondent No.1. The record indicates that, the Petitioner No.1 wife along with major children i.e. Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are on one side, whereas
Dattatrey Shivaji Mane Vs. Lilabai Shivaji Mane and Others
Jayantram Vallabhdas Meswania Vs. Vallabhdas Govindram Meswania
M. Venugopal Vs. The District Magistrate Cum District Collector, Kanyakumari District and Ors.
Nasir Vs. Government of NCT of Delhi & Others
N. Kannadasan Vs. Ajoy Khose and Ors. Reported in 2009(7) SCC 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.