SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Bom) 2224

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
R.M. Borde, R.G. Ketkar, JJ.
Julio Ribeiro - Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra - Respondent
Public Interest Litigation (L) No. 4 of 2018
Decided On : 16-02-2018

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sujay N. Kantawalla a/w. Mr. Ashish Mehta, Mr. Shashwat Rai, Ms.Sonal Dangri, Mr. Ojas Gole and Mr. Kartik Vig i/b. Mr. Brijesh Pathak, Advocates, for the Petitioner in PIL(L) No.4 of 2018.; Mr. Sapan Shrivastava, Advocate, for the Petitioner in person in PIL(L) No.6 of 2018.; Ms. Purnima H. Kantharia, Government Pleader a/w. Ms. Deepali Patankar, AAGP, for the Respondents No.1, 2, 7 and 8 in PIL(L) No.4 of 2018 and for respondent No.3 in PIL(L) No.6 of 2018.; Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate a/w. Mrs. S.M. Modle, Smt. Trupti H.Puranik, Mr. Sagar Patil, Ms. Pooja Yadav, Advocates, for the Respondents No.3 to 6-MCGM in PIL(L) No.4 of 2018 and for respondents No.1, 2 and 4 in PIL(L) No.6 of 2018.; Mr. Ramesh Soni a/w. Mr.Sameer Pandit, Madhupreetha Elango i/b. M/s.Wadia Ghandy & Co, for the Applicant in CHSW No.51 of 2018 and Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association and Hotel and Restaurant Association (Western India) in PIL(L) No.4/2018.; Mr. Vijay M. Thorat a/w. Mr.Madhav Thorat, Mr. Anukul Seth, Fauzan Shaikh, Shridevi C. Kotkar, Mr. Jaivardhan Singh, Mr. Madhav Kulkarni, Mr. Aditya Bhagat i/b. M.V. Thorat, Advocates, for the Intervenor - Maharashtra Employees and Restaurant Association.; Mr. Yatin Sawant, Dy. Commissioner, State Excise Department is present in person, for the Respondents; Mr. Anil Chaskar, Superintendent, Mumbai City, State Excise Department is present in person, for the Respondents; Mr. Vijay Thorat, Inspector, FDivision, Mumbai City, State Excise Department is present in person, for the Respondents; Mr. Mahesh Tambe, SubInspector, G Division, Mumbai City, State Excise Department is present in person, for the Respondents; Mr.Suryakant Shivram Naikwadi, Police Inspector is present in person, for the Respondents; Mr. Ahmed Usman Pathan, Senior Police Inspector is present in person, for the Respondents; Mr. Shivaji Chavanke, PSI is present in person, for the Respondents; Mr. Banait D., Director, Town Planning Department is present in person, for the Respondents

The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of strict adherence to fire safety norms and construction regulations, and the need for an independent probe to investigate violations and make recommendations for preventing similar incidents in the future.

Headnote:

Fire Safety Violations - Municipal Regulations - Regulation 58 of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai, 1991, Regulation 33(16) - The court discussed the violations of fire safety norms and construction regulations by the owners of the restaurants and the mill owner. The court highlighted the negligent attitude of the operators and the institutional failure of the Municipal Corporation and the State Excise Department. The court also emphasized the need for an independent probe to investigate the violations and make recommendations to avoid such incidents in the future.

Fact of the Case:

The court was informed about the outbreak of fire at two restaurants, '1 Above' and 'Mojo's Bistro' within the Kamala Mills compound. The Commissioner of Municipal Corporation conducted a preliminary enquiry and tendered a report, which revealed violations of construction and fire safety norms by the restaurant owners and the mill owner. The violations led to the loss of 14 lives and injuries to more than 30 individuals.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the operators of the restaurants and the mill owner were negligent and had violated fire safety norms and construction regulations. It also noted the institutional failure of the Municipal Corporation and the State Excise Department in ensuring compliance with regulations.

Issues: The issues involved violations of fire safety norms, construction regulations, and the misuse of the mill land for commercial purposes. The court also addressed the need for an independent probe to investigate the violations and fix accountability.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for strict adherence to fire safety norms and construction regulations to prevent such incidents. It also highlighted the importance of an independent probe to investigate the violations and make recommendations for the future.

Final Decision: The court directed the appointment of an independent Three Member Committee, under the Chairmanship of a retired Judge of the High Court, to probe into the incident, consider the violations, and make recommendations to avoid similar occurrences in the future.

ORDER

1. During the course of hearing of the matter on 15th January, 2018, this Court was informed that the State Government has instructed the Commissioner of Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (for short, ''Municipal Corporation'') to enquire into the matter relating to outbreak of fire within the premises of Kamala Mills compound at two restaurants, namely, ''1 Above'' and ''Mojo''s Bistro'' and to submit a comprehensive report covering all related issues to the State Government. In accordance with the directives issued by the State Government, the Commissioner of Municipal Corporation has conducted a preliminary enquiry and tendered a report. Copy of the same has also been placed on record in the instant matter in observance of the directions issued earlier.

2. Certain prima facie findings recorded in the report by the Commissioner of Municipal Corporation needs to be considered.

3. So far as the probable cause of fire is concerned, based upon the findings of the Chief Fire Officer, the Commissioner has drawn certain conclusions in the report. It is noted in the report that the owners of two restaurants have violated all the Rules and Regulations of construction and fire safety norms. Inspite of the notices and prosecutions launched against them by the Ward staff, they continued to indulge into the violations with impunity. It is recorded that the materials used for construction of terrace-covering was extremely inflammable which caused very rapid spread of fire on the entire terrace portion within matter of minutes, giving no chance to the customers to vacate the premises safely. The owners of two restaurants have been negligent about fire safety issues and have shown disregard to the Rules and Regulations. It is concluded that the fire started from the Mojo''s Bistro restaurant due to fire embers emanating from fanning of charcoal for use in the hookah. The premises had a very high level of fire hazard due to the fire tricks played by the bartenders. The activity was dangerous and posed a threat to life and property. The rampart unauthorized use of hookah on the terrace covered illegally, was another contributing factor.

4. The operators of ''1 Above'' had constructed a full scale restaurant illegally on the open terrace under their possession. It has also been reported that the fire escapes of the building at all levels were either under illegal use, closed or locked which prevented use of the same by the customers at time of fire. The long fire exit which was supposed to be used by the people was also encroached with pipe fittings along the parapet wall and covering of the same with the aluminum sheets thus reducing the effective width of the fire escape passage to the extent of almost 60%. The staircase exists were closed due to glass partition at lift lobby and the staircase at the open terrace was made inaccessible and not visible due to unauthorized construction on the terrace fully covering it on ''1 Above'' restaurant side. The restaurant owners have not taken any safety precautions at all.

5. So far as ''Mojo''s Bistro'' restaurant is concerned, it has been reported that the owners, apparently in collusion with the owner of Kamala Mills Mr.Ramesh Gowani, have carried out massive unauthorized construction within the building and the open terrace which was shown as fire exit for both the restaurants. It is reported that the owners of ''Mojo''s Bistro'' restaurant have raised unauthorized construction which was not part of NOC. The construction material which was used for erecting unauthorized structure was prone to fire. Although action was taken earlier of demolition of the illegal construction at the instance of the Corporation, the owners again carried the illegal construction and started business. The restaurant was opened in an area which was not permitted. At the restaurants hookah parlor was being operated and the area was being used for smoking purposes unauthorizedly. The permit issued by the Excise

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top