SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Bom) 2349

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Prakash D. Naik, J.
Jai Laxmi Co-op Hsg Soc - Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra - Respondent
Criminal Revision Application No. 435 of 2016
Decided On : 10-04-2018

Advocates Appeared:
Niranjan Mundargi, Adv., Mayur Bhojwani, Adv., Anees A Patel, Adv., Manilal Kher Ambalal, Adv., A.R. Satish, Adv., A.R. Kapadnis, Adv.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code - Section 306 read with 511 of - Criminal Case - First Information Report (FIR) - statement of the complainant was recorded - It is alleged that the complainant is employed at Bharat Petroleum Corporation since 15 years. He is in habit of consuming liquor since long. By using his credit card of ABN Bank, he had made purchases. He is also having credit cards of ABN Ambro bank, City Bank, ICICI Bank. The complainant had purchased gold ornaments of Rs.75, 000/- by using credit card of City Bank for his friend - He was frequently making use of his credit cards for liquor - One person, visited his house and informed him that he has come from ICICI Bank -He insisted that the complainant should make payment of dues towards the credit cards. He threatened that in case the money is not paid, household articles from his house will be taken away - Held, Measure of proximity is not in relation to time and action but in relation to intention. In other words, act must reveal, with reasonable certainty, in conjunction with other facts and circumstances and not necessarily in isolation, an intention, as distinguished from a mere desire or object, to commit particular offence, though the act by itself may be merely suggestive or indicative of such intention; but, that it must be, that is, it must be indicative or suggestive of the intention." - Applying said analogy and test laid down in the aforesaid decision, in the present case, it cannot be said that there is any abetment to commit the alleged crime or any attempt to do so. Apart from that, in my considered opinion, the accused cannot be prosecuted by involving Section 511 to be read with Section 306 IPC - Court do not think that there was any evidence, even, prima facie, to proceed against the applicant for the alleged offences, and, therefore, the applicant should have been discharged by the trial Court - Criminal Revision Application is allowed

JUDGMENT

Prakash D. Naik, J -The applicant is arraigned as an accused in the proceedings arising out of C.R.No.I-451 of 2007, registered with Kalamboli Poilce Station for offences punishable under Section 306 read with 511 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). On completing the investigation, the charge-sheet was filed before the competent Court and the proceedings were numbered as Regular Criminal Case No.227 of 2008. The case was then committed to the Court of Sessions and numbered as Sessions Case No.31 of 2014. The applicant is aggrieved by the order dated 6thMay, 2016, passed by the Sessions Court Raigad - Alibag, rejecting the application for discharge preferred by the applicant before the said Court vide Exhibit - 9.

2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are as follows:

(a) The First Information Report (FIR) was registered at the instance of Shri Shankar Pandian Subayya Dever. The statement of the complainant was recorded on 13th October, 2007. It is alleged that the complainant is employed at Bharat Petroleum Corporation since 15 years. He is in habit of consuming liquor since long. By using his credit card of ABN Ambro Bank, he had made purchases. He is also having credit cards of ABN Ambro bank, City Bank, ICICI Bank. The complainant had purchased gold ornaments of Rs.75, 000/- by using credit card of City Bank for his friend Madhavrao. He was frequently making use of his credit cards for liquor.

(b) one person, named, Satish visited his house and informed him that he has come from ICICI Bank. He insisted that the complainant should make payment of dues towards the credit cards. He threatened that in case the money is not paid, household articles from his house will be taken away.

Satish used to give him calls frequently on his mobile phone and the phone at his company office and used to threaten him for paying said dues. Since he was disturbed, the complainant had consumed sleeping pills in the month of April and rat kill poison for which he was treated in the hospital at New Panvel. At that time, due to oversight he informed that he had consumed the medicine/poison on account of family reason.

(c) On 6th October, 2007, when the complainant visited his office, he was informed that there was a phone call for him from one Satish at the instance of Citi Bank. Thereafter, he again received a call on his mobile phone. He was informed that the caller had left the ICICI Bank and had joined Citi Bank. He was also informed that an amount of Rs.1, 30, 000/- is due and payable by him to the Citi Bank.

The complainant informed the caller that he has paid entire dues of the Bank, however, he was informed that on verification of the file, it was noticed that the dues are to be paid to the Bank by him. At that time, the complainant was threatened by the accused stating that he will be traced and will be handpicked for non payment of the amount. Due to that, the complainant was under mental pressure.

(d) Due to fear, the complainant did not join his duty on 8th October, 2007. He went to his room at Panvel and, thereafter, to the dispensary of Dr.Wani. He told the doctor that he is suffering from cough and cold and obtained medicines from him. He also complained that he is not getting sufficient sleep and hence, doctor prescribed ten sleeping pills and advised him to take one pill at night.

Complainant used the said prescription for purchasing sleeping pills at three different medical stores and purchased 30 sleeping pills. Thereafter, he consumed country liquor (Tadi) at the Tadi Shop and walked towards Diva side by Panvel railway line. He sat near one nullah on the side of the railway line and consumed 30 sleeping tablets along with water. Thereafter, he started walking towards Kalamboli, and on the way, he met his brother-inlaw Venkatesh, who admitted him at MGM Hospital. The FIR was registered for the offence punishable under Sections 306 and 511 IPC.

3. Applicant preferred an application for discharge before the Sessions Court vi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top