V.L.ACHLIYA
Santosh – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Commissioner – Respondent
JUDGMENT
V.L. Achliya, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of learned counsels for petitioner and respondent no. 2 heard finally at the stage of admission.
2. By this petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-original plaintiff has challenged the order dated 24.01.2018 passed by the 9th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar in R.C.S. No. 280/2016. By the impugned order, the trial Court has allowed the application (Exh. 30) moved by the respondent No. 2 under Order 1 Rule 10 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, "C.P.C.") to join him as a party defendant no.2 to the suit filed by the petitioner-plaintiff.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent no. 2. No notice issued to respondent no. 1 as presence of respondent No. 1 not required for disposal of petition.
4. Before adverting to deal with the submissions advanced, it is useful to refer few facts leading to filing of this petition. The petitioner-plaintiff herein has filed the civil suit seeking declaration and injunction as against the respondent no. 1 -Municipal Corporation to effect that the notice dated 28.04.2016 issued by the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.