K.L.WADANE
Vaseem Fatema Hashmi – Appellant
Versus
Sayyad Akil – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K.L. Wadane, J. - Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.
2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of parties, both the matters are taken up for final disposal.
3. The aforesaid criminal writ petition and criminal revision are filed against the common judgment and order dated 13.10.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in PWDVA Cri. Appeal No. 95/2013 and PWDVA Cri. Appeal No. 102/2013 which were filed by the respective parties challenging the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Aurangabad in Cri. M.A. No. 1640/2011.
4. Brief facts of the case may be stated as follows:
(1) The petitioners/original applicants had filed Cri. M.A. No. 1640/2011 under the provisions of section 12 of Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2015 (for short, ''D.V. Act'') seeking reliefs under sections 18, 19, 20 and 22 of the D.V. Act against the respondent Nos. 1 to 3/original respondents. The parties herein are referred to by their original status in Cri. M.A. No. 1640/2011. Applicant No. 1 is wife and applicant No. 2 is minor son of applicant No. 1 and respondent No. 1/husband. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 appears t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.