M.S.SANKLECHA, RIYAZ I.CHAGLA
M. P. Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
ORDER
M.S. Sanklecha, J. - At the request of the parties, this petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission.
2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges a notice dated 30th August, 2018 issued by the Deputy Director in the office of the Director General of GST Intelligence (Respondent No. 2 herein). The impugned notice dated 30th August, 2018 attaches the petitioner''s Account in Union Bank of India under Section 87(b)(i) of the Finance Act, 1994 (the Act), for recovery of service tax payable under the Act.
3. This, the petitioner complains is, without jurisdiction. This for the reason that the impugned notice dated 30th August, 2018, has been issued when there is no amount adjudicated as payable under the Act after issuing a show cause notice under Section 73 of the Act. Consequently, it is the Petitioner''s grievance that attachment by the impugned notice dated 30th August, 2018 is contrary to and in defiance of the binding decisions of this Court in Quality Fabricators & Erectors v. Dy. Dir, DGCEU - 2016 (41) S.T.R. 11 (Bom.), Lawson Tours & Travels (I) P. Ltd., v. Dy. Dir, DGCEV - 2015 (317) E.L.T. 248 (Bom.), ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Un
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.