V.K.JADHAV
Abdul Raheman – Appellant
Versus
Shaikh Shakil Ahamad – Respondent
JUDGMENT
V. K. Jadhav, J. - The applicant/original complainant has preferred this Criminal Revision Application against the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhusawal dated 21.5.2005 in RCC No.321/2002 under sections 420, 467, 468 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Prosecution story, in brief, is as under :
a) The respondent/accused No.1 Shaikh Shakil is friend of the applicant/original complainant Abdul Raheman and respondent/accused No.2 Shivajirao Patil is friend of accused No.1. The Plot No.7 in S.No.110/3 situated at village Kandari is owned and possessed by applicant/original complainant. Respondent/accused No.1 being the friend of the informant was having knowledge about the said plot. Applicant/original complainant has decided to sell the plot and thus requested to respondent/accused No.1 to find out the purchaser for the same. As per the prosecution story, respondent/accused No.1 had taken signature of the applicant/complainant on one blank stamp paper and prepared a false and forged general power of attorney on the same. On the basis of the forged General Power of Attorney respondent/accused No.1 has transferred the aforesaid p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.