SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 2229

K.R.SHRIRAM
Shantaram Namdeo Sathe R/o Ahirgaon – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anamika Malhotra, Advocate, Vrishali Raje, Advocate, P.N. Joshi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

K.R.Shriram, J. - This is an appeal filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure impugning an order and judgment dated 19th April 1999 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Pimpalgaon (B), by which the Magistrate was pleased to acquit the accused, i.e., respondent no.2 herein.

2. Though notice has been issued to appellant, nobody is present. With the assistance of the APP Ms. Malhotra and Ms. Raje, counsel appearing for respondent no.2, I have perused the records and proceedings, evidence and the impugned judgment.

3. The facts in brief are that the complainant, i.e., the appellant, was an agriculturist and was raising various crops in his land including grapes. The accused/respondent carries on business as a trader and, inter alia, exports grapes. The accused is alleged to have purchased grapes from the complainant, paid some amount and for the balance due, gave a cheque on 23rd May 1997 for Rs.2 lakhs. When the cheque bearing no.613072 was presented, the cheque was returned unpaid in view of the stop payment instructions given by the accused/respondent. It is the case of the complainant that he requested the accused to honour the payment but the acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top