JUDGMENT

V L Achliya, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent heard finally.

2. By this Petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 12.04.2019 (hereinafter referred to as "the impugned order") passed by the respondent No.1 i.e. District Magistrate, Beed. By the impugned order, the respondent no.1 has cancelled the licence issued in favour of the petitioner under the provisions of "The Rules for Licensing and Controlling Places of Public Amusements, (Other than Cinemas) and Performances for Public Amusement, including Cabaret Performances, Discotheque, Games, Pool Game Parlours, Amusement Parlours Providing Computer Games, Virtual Reality Games, Cyber Cafes, Games with Net Connectivity, Bowling Alleys, Card Rooms, Social Clubs, Sports Clubs, Meals and Tamashas Rules, 1960" (hereinafter referred to as "the said Rules") as well as sale of tickets for such performance. Being aggrieved the petitioner has preferred this Petition.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP representing the respondents. Perused the record and proceedings.

4. By referring to the overall facts of the case,