SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Bom) 3028

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
S.J. Kathawalla, J.
Mukesh J. Shah - Appellant
Versus
Kiran Mukesh Shah Nee Chandrakant Shah & Ors. - Respondents
Arbitration Petition No. 836 of 2018
Decided On : 22-12-2018

Advocates Appeared:
Rajiv Narula I/by M/s. Jhangiani Narula and Associates, for Appellant; Mr. P.S.Chavan I/by M/s. Pradeep Chavan and Associates, for Respondents; Mr. J.P.Sen, Senior Advocate - Amicus Curiae

Headnote:

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 7(1) and 9 - Code of Civil Procedure - Order 32A - Dissolution of marriage - Family Settlement - Seeks interlocutory reliefs - Petitioner is husband of Respondent No. 1 and father of Respondent Nos. 2 have admittedly fallen out - On account of their differences, and with a view to a dissolution of their marriage, and along with their children entered into a document styled as a Memorandum of Arrangement of Family Settlement dated - Agrees and assures that after filing of Divorce Petition referred hereinabove, she shall diligently without fail appear at all hearings before court as well as before Counselor and shall give her express consent for dissolution of marriage and shall not do any acts of commission or omission by which dissolution of marriage is refused and/or petition is dismissed - Appear before court and give her express consent to dissolution of marriage upon terms contained herein, entire amount received by her out of sale of said residential flat being Flat No. shall be refunded to said along with interest @ 15% per annum, which shall be payable within 15 days calling upon said to pay said amount in view of any default committed by said Kiran in complying with terms hereto - Whether for an order or injunction or whatever relief, in circumstances arising out of a marital relationship - Whether proceedings are pending/initiated as suits or other proceedings – Held, As noted by Kerela High Court in Shyni v. George (supra) one of the important aims of setting up of Family Courts is to bring about a reconciliation between spouses if possible and to permit them to separate with dignity only if all attempts at reconciliation fail - Court have no hesitation in holding that disputes that have arisen between parties to present petition fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of family court and would be incapable of reference to arbitration - It follows that no reliefs can be granted under section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as sought by Petitioner - Petition is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs - Needless to state, this order does not in any way touch upon merits of dispute between the parties and Petitioner will be at liberty to adopt such proceedings before Family Court as he may be advised - Before parting with Judgment, Court would like to place on record Courts appreciation for able assistance rendered by amicus curaie, Senior Advocate Mr. J.P. Sen in matter – Order accordingly

JUDGMENT

S.J. Kathawalla, J. - By the present Petition, the Petitioner seeks interlocutory reliefs under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 pending arbitral proceedings that the Petitioner proposes to initiate.

2. The Petitioner (Mukesh) is the husband of Respondent No. 1 (Kiran) and the father of Respondent Nos. 2 ( Jigar) and 3 (Kinjal). Mukesh and Kiran have admittedly fallen out. On account of their differences, and with a view to a dissolution of their marriage, Mukesh and Kiran along with their children, Jigar and Kinjal entered into a document styled as a ''Memorandum of Arrangement of Family Settlement'' dated 25th April 2017. The Memorandum, to the extent that it is material, is reproduced hereinbelow:

Whereas:

(a) The party of the First Part to the party of Fourth Part are members of the Shah Family. The said Mukesh and the said Kiran are husband and wife and out of their wedlock, they have the said Jigar and the said Kinjal as son and daughter respectively;

(b) The said Mukesh, the said Kiran, the said Jigar and Kinjal have been living together as a family at the flat bearing No. 902, Mayfair Kumkum, S.V. Road, Near M.A. High School, Andheri (West), Mumbai 400 058.

(c) The said Mukesh has also formed the HUF in the name of "Mukesh J Shah (HUF)" and the said HUF holds certain immovable properties in the shape of commercial galas at Borivali, more particularly described in the Annexure-1 annexed hereto;

(d) The said Mukesh in his life time has acquired various movable and immovable properties in his name as well as in the name of the said Jigar and the said Kinjal (members of HUF) for the benefit of family including development rights in his firm name of M/s. Alta Sadguru Joint Venture in respect of property bearing CTS No. 539-A situate at Village Malad belonging to one Sham Nirmal Co-operative Housing society Ltd.;

(e) The said Mukesh has also allotted six flats coming to his share in the name of the said Jigar and Kinjal as enumerated in Annexure-2 annexed hereto;

(f) The said Mukesh also has formed and registered a company known as "Alta Construction Pvt. Ltd." And the said Jigar is a shareholder and holding 3000 equity shares of Rs. 10/- face value and has a deposit of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees thirty Thousand Only) in the said Company.

(g) In view of discord and differences between the parties hereto, i.e. Mukesh J Shah on one hand and the said Kiran and the said Jigar and the said Kinjal on the other hand, the said Mukesh and the said Kiran have agreed to dissolve their marriage and stay separately. The said Jigar and the said Kinjal have decided to stay with their mother (the said Kiran). The terms and conditions of the said separation has been agreed upon between the family members:

(h) The parties hereto have arrived at a family settlement and the parties are desirous of recording the terms and conditions of sharing the benefits of the properties and estate held by the family members as under.

Now This Memorandum of Arrangement of Family Settlement Witnesseth as Follows:

1. The parties hereto agree and declare that this Family Settlement is being executed to put an end to all disputes and differences amongst family members.

2. The said Mukesh and the said Kiran hereby agree, declare and confirm that in view of constant several disputes, discord and differences between them, they are unable to live together as husband and wife and as such they have decided to make an application for dissolution of their marriage under Section 13- B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 within a period of 15 days of signing of these presents.

3. The said Kiran hereby agrees and assures that after filing of the Divorce Petition referred hereinabove, she shall diligently without fail appear at all the hearings before the court as well as before the Counselor and shall give her express consent for dissolution of marriage and shall not do any acts of commission or omission by which the dissolution of marriage is refused and/o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top