JUDGMENT

Prasanna B. Varale, J. - The present petition was heard alongwith other connected petitions, however, for the sake of convenience, we are deciding each petition separately, though the facts and documents are common.

2. By the present writ petition, the following two basic reliefs have been claimed by the petitioner:

(a) quashing and setting aside the order dated 19/03/2015, passed by respondent No.1 allowing the transfer of the school by name, Indira Prathmik Shala, run by respondent No.5- trust, from its original place Baijipura, Aurangabad to Wadgaon-Kolhati Taluka and Dist. Aurangabad and,

(b) quashing and setting aside the order dated 19/02/2016 passed by respondent No.5/trust, whereby the petitioner was placed under suspension .

Rest of the prayers are interim prayers in the petition.

3. At the outset, it is necessary to note that by a statement made at the Bar, by Mr. Barlinge, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, the challenge in the present petition was restricted in respect of transfer of the school from one place to another, which has been recorded by the Court in its order dated 24/10/2016, resultantly, learned Advocate Mr. Barlinge has restricted his arguments on